Hardware Metrics Scaling Calculator
Calculate key hardware performance metrics and estimate scaled performance across different technology nodes. Enter baseline parameters for your design and explore how area efficiency and energy efficiency change with technology scaling.
Key Metrics
- Area Efficiency: $\text{AE} = \frac{\text{Throughput (Gbps)}}{\text{Area (mm}^2\text{)}}$ (Gbps/mm²)
- Energy Efficiency: $\text{EE} = \frac{\text{Power (mW)}}{\text{Throughput (Gbps)}}$ (pJ/bit)
- Dynamic Power: $P \approx C \times V_{DD}^2 \times f$ (dynamic power)
- Throughput: $\frac{\text{Code Length (bits)}}{\text{Time for a new output to appear (ns)}}$ (Gbps)
- Information Throughput: $\frac{\text{Message Length (bits)}}{\text{Time for a new output to appear (ns)}}$ (Gbps)
Typical scaling from node size $n_1$ to $n_2$ with voltage $V_1$ to $V_2$:
- Area Factor: $AS = \left(\frac{n_2}{n_1}\right)^2$
- Energy Factor: $ES=\left (\frac{V_2}{ V_1} \right)^2 \times \left( \frac{n_2}{n_1}\right)^2$
- Scaled Area Efficiency: $\text{AE}_{scaled} = \frac{\text{Throughput (Gbps)}}{\text{Area (mm}^2\text{)} \times AS}$ (Gbps/mm²)
- Scaled Energy Efficiency: $\text{EE}_{scaled} = ES \times \frac{\text{Power (mW)}}{\text{Throughput (Gbps)}}$ (pJ/bit)
Note: Actual scaling depends on design, architecture, and process variations. Scaling parameters obtained from: C. -H. Lin, C. -Y. Chen, A. -Y. Wu and T. -H. Tsai, "Low-Power Memory-Reduced Traceback MAP Decoding for Double-Binary Convolutional Turbo Decoder," in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1005-1016, May 2009, doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2009.2017118.
Baseline Calculator
Technology Scaling Estimator
Select target technology nodes to estimate scaled performance:
Notes on Scaling
- Simplified Model: This calculator uses simplified CMOS scaling rules. Real designs face more complex tradeoffs.
- Architecture Impact: Scaling may enable architectural changes (more parallelism, pipelining) not captured here.
- Leakage Power: Static power becomes dominant at smaller nodes and is not fully modeled.
- Design Complexity: Smaller nodes often require more sophisticated design techniques.
- 180nm: ~1.8V, legacy designs
- 90nm: ~1.2V, mature process
- 65nm: ~1.1V
- 45nm: ~1.0V
- 28nm: ~0.9V, widely used
- 16nm/14nm: ~0.8V, FinFET
- 7nm: ~0.75V, advanced FinFET
- 5nm: ~0.7V, leading edge
- 3nm: ~0.65V, cutting edge
Enjoy Reading This Article?
Here are some more articles you might like to read next: